This site is intended for health professionals only!

Published on 16 February 2015

Share this story:

HPE LIVE 2014: part II

 

 

Here, we conclude our report of the 2014 HPE LIVE conference, with summaries of presentations from the advances in therapeutics and Industry updates streams
Electronic prescribing and dispensing robots
Rod Beard, Sunderland City Hospitals Foundation Trust, UK
Sunderland has been using electronic prescribing (EP) since 2001 and has had robotic dispensing (RD) directly linked to the EP system since 2009. The presentation outlined, as a case study, what the benefits were and what features Sunderland found to deliver benefits. The impact of EP-RD systems was also considered on ward-based pharmacy services and the findings were linked to academic models of sustainability of organisations.
Background: Sunderland is a 1000-bed hospital employing approximately 5000 staff that has had a fully integrated EP system since 2001. Integrations refers to the ability of the system to pass information seamlessly across different modules without re-keying of the information (for example, pathology results, nursing notes, medication etc).
The talk explored how the Drug Error Analysis Study (quoted in the document, A Spoonful of Sugar) identified the frequency of dispensing errors. The talk showed how, by skilfully linking the EP-RD system, every one of the errors mentioned was designed out of the EP-RD system. Also, by linking automatic labellers to the system, there was no potential to introduce errors in the dispensing process, and as a by-product of doing this, dispensing became almost instantaneous. The impact on efficiency is significant. Some parameters around operational efficiency were discussed, which are published in the literature.
The operational impact of this method of working freed staff from mundane dispensary work to being available to deliver clinical services. The talk looked at published work about pharmacists’ views on these systems on their practice. The survey found overwhelming support, particularly in the areas of amount of information, policy enforcement, job satisfaction and ward working relationships. The fact that EP enforced the formulary meant pharmacists did not have to do the task of policy enforcement. The talk identified that pharmacists received three months’ training on the systems at Sunderland, significantly more than junior medical staff. This in turn created an environment conducive to good team working. This contributed to a positive view of working at Sunderland, and this fed through to corporate recognition of the value of pharmacy services.
The talk linked this to the taxonomies of Bloom and Ackoff, and showed how there were similarities to the ‘higher’ valued-added clinical services pharmacy could offer (warfarin clinics, independent prescribers, Emergency Department pharmacy teams, re-admission pharmacy teams etc).
Key points
  • By directly linking EP to robots, dispensing errors can be designed out
  • When EP and robots are linked, and robotic labellers are used, dispensing processes can become almost instantaneous
  • The efficiencies created by these systems allow staff to be re-deployed into more clinical areas.
  • Pharmacists have more time for developing clinical practice because they are not involved in the more mundane work of dispensing
  • Developing clinical services means pharmacy is seen as adding value and not adding cost.
Effective management of osteoporosis: an update
Nuttan Tanna, Pharmacist Consultant, Womens Health & Older People,
NW London Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
This presentation covered the diagnosis of osteoporosis and risk factor assessment for the clinical outcome of interest when reviewing a patient with osteoporosis. These are fragility or low trauma fractures, with morbidity and mortality projections indicating an increase in the incidence due to longevity and an aging population. A-related loss of bone mineral density generally starts at age 40 years and occurs asymptomatically until a fragility fracture occurs. Fractures result in disability, pain and vulnerability; with high personal, NHS and social care costs and burden.
The evidence base for risk factors has been reviewed by National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Clinical Guidance CG46 and include age, sex, genetic risk for loss of bone mineral density and secondary risks associated with co-morbidities or co-prescriptions. The intervention threshold for bone sparing therapy for steroid-induced osteoporosis is a T Score of –1.5 as opposed to the generally applied higher threshold of  –2.5. For a patient on planned oral steroid treatment for three months or more, RCP guidance recommends simultaneous co-prescribing of a bisphosphonate or alternative bone sparing therapy without needing T score results from a DEXA scan.
What the lifetime management plan for a textbook case of an osteoporosis patient could look like, to include lifestyle interventions and choice of bone sparing therapy, was also discussed. How the NICE guidance fits in when considering the initiation of prescription for primary or secondary prevention of osteoporosis fractures was an important part of the presentation. Lastly, the various bone sparing therapies and specific risks and benefits for each option were covered, including discussion of patient compliance/concordance issues. Current evidence base suggests that compliance to bisphophonate drugs drops to around 50-70 % within the first year. There is also the question of whether hormone replacement therapy has a place in osteoporosis risk management, particularly for premature ovarian insufficiency and women with recent menopause and a diagnosis of osteopenia (DEXA T Score between –1.0 to –2.5)
Key points
  • Osteoporosis leads to nearly 9 million fractures annually worldwide; over 300,000 patients present with fragility fractures to hospitals in the UK each year.
  • Fragility fractures result from mechanical forces that would not ordinarily result in fracture. WHO quantifies these low energy traumatic fractures as resulting from forces equivalent to a fall from standing height or less.
  • FRAX is a computerised algorithm, with easy access via the Internet that allows an individual or health professional to assess risk for a fragility fracture for that individual. Q-Risk is also used in primary care as an alternative risk assessment tool.
  • Bone-sparing therapies provide optimal outcomes in patients without underlying osteomalacia (calcium or vitamin D deficiency state).
  • Pharmaceutical care for the osteoporosis patient includes medical history taking, review of blood tests and DEXA scan results as appropriate, with assessment of risks and benefits of any particular chosen bone sparing therapy and agreement by the patient to the ongoing management plan.
Prescribing for cardiology patients in hospital
Jo Bateman, The Countess of Chester Hospital, UK
Before 2011, the Heart Failure (HF) Service comprised of a non-prescribing specialist nurse who counselled patients and collected Advancing Quality audit data to meet Trust targets. In 2011, funding was provided for eight hours per week of a specialist cardiology Pharmacist to join the HF team. The nurse and pharmacist both completed the prescribing course and in addition the pharmacist undertook a Clinical Examination Course. Their role was to independently assess, clinically examine and prescribe for HF patients referred in the Trust with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD, ejection fraction <40%). The pharmacist prioritised the complex patients with multiple co-morbidities and medications to individualise treatment and minimise interactions, adverse reactions and contraindications. Last year, 170 additional pharmaceutical interventions (excluding prescribing) were recorded by the pharmacist (wards had existing pharmacist cover). Interventions included providing specialist advice on the safest medications in cardiac patients, renal impairment and therapeutic drug monitoring.
The pharmacist accounted for 75% of HF prescriptions within the team. This has resulted in a reduction in the number of patients inappropriately discharged without an ACE inhibitor or beta-blocker. In addition, overall readmissions were reduced. During routine examinations, acutely unwell patients were identified and referred to a Cardiologist or transferred to CCU.
The HF service has continued to evolve. There is a day-case intravenous diuretic service to reduce re-admissions and symptomatically manage end-stage patients. Daily visits are made to MAU to ensure AQ standards are met, facilitate early discharge and ensure transfer of care to the Community HF team. Recently, Urgent Review Clinics For patients who need to be seen within one week of discharge have begun to facilitate discharge from hospital and reduce early re-admission.
The prescribing role has continued to develop in areas other than HF. Prescribing during the CCU ward round has resulted in fewer prescribing errors, increased time for teaching and provided a more efficient service. The Pharmacist is undertaking a ‘Clinical Diploma in Cardiology’ at Bradford University to complete an MSc. This opens further possibilities for prescribing in other areas such as AF, in the future.
Developing the new role was scary at first. Clinical examination and presenting cases to consultants is intimidating. Evaluating chest X-rays, ECGs and complex patients can be challenging and may require advice from senior colleagues. However, over the years the role has been hugely rewarding and had a positive impact on improving patient care.
Key points
  • Heart Failure patients are often complex with multiple co-morbidities and medications.
  • It is important to ensure all patients are on an ACE inhibitor and beta-blocker where possible.
  • The prescribing pharmacist focuses on complex patients to ensure a holistic approach to clinical and pharmaceutical review, rather than heart failure in isolation.
  • Pharmacists are uniquely skilled to prescribe in specialist areas which should ensure safer prescribing.
  • Be brave and work outside your comfort zone to develop roles that can improve patient care.
Prescribing for cardiology patients in hospital
Ray Fitzpatrick, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust and Keele University, UK 
Medicines provided through a homecare service allow treatment to be delivered to, and if necessary, administered to patients in their own home. There are currently over 260,000 patients receiving medicines through homecare and the market is worth over £1.5bn per annum. There are a number of benefits to delivering medicines through homecare including:
  • Treatment in the convenience of their home
  • Reduced number of hospital visits for patients
  • Net savings to NHS, as medicines supplied this way are VAT exempt
  • Release of hospital pharmacy dispensing capacity.
However, there are challenges such as lead times, maintenance of cold chain, and particularly capacity issues with providers. The later has resulted in NHS England issuing a safety alert in April 2014 relating to missed doses with homecare services.
In 2011, the Department of Health published the first review of homecare services, Homecare Medicines: Towards a Vision of the Future.  This made a number of recommendations, including recommending the Chief Pharmacist is at the centre of managing homecare services, and the need for national standards.  In 2013, the Royal Pharmaceutical Society (RPS) published the first national standards for managing homecare services.  This was followed in 2014 with the publication of a handbook to support homecare teams working to the standards.  Both documents are accessible on the RPS website (www.rpharms.com/support-resources/professional-standards.asp) and are organised around three key domains;
  • The Patient Experience
  • Implementing and delivering safe and effective homecare services
  • Governance of homecare services.
There is much that can be done locally to maximise the benefits and minimise the risks with homecare services. First, Chief pharmacists need to develop a homecare strategy which should be based on a gap analysis between how they currently manage homecare services and the RPS standards. Central to good governance arrangements when managing homecare services is having the appropriate staffing resource which could be funded out of the VAT savings. As most medicines provided via homecare are excluded from tariff, it is the commissioners who benefit from these savings. Therefore they need to be engaged at an early stage and should be prepared to share any savings with hospitals.
Key points
  • Over 260,000 patients currently receive medicines via homecare.
  • The provision of medicines via homecare has many benefits but also challenges notably missed doses due to capacity issues.
  • The first national review of homecare services in 2011 recommended the hospital Chief Pharmacist as central to managing these services.
  • Royal Pharmaceutical Society has subsequently published a set of national standards and a supporting handbook, available at www.rpharms.com/support-resources/professional-standards.asp.
  • Hospital pharmacies must have the appropriate staffing resources to effectively manage homecare services which could be funded from VAT savings on the medicines.


Most read




Latest Issue

Be in the know
Subscribe to Hospital Pharmacy Europe newsletter and magazine